It’s an idea that has got London’s nature lovers salivating. Could London, one of the world’s busiest metropolises, become a National Park City—and what does that mean exactly?
In early October, London came one step closer to declaring itself the world’s first National Park City. But is it truly possible to transform a city into a national park? What does this mean exactly? And how might Londoners, visitors, and the city’s green spaces benefit from it?
“Let’s think of London not just as a political, cultural and financial center, but as an ecological center too,” says Daniel Raven-Ellison, campaigner, geographer and the official Chief Exploration Officer for the London National Park City Foundation, a new charity launched in October 2017.
This initiative even has the formal backing of London’s mayor Sadiq Khan. So determined is the mayor to make London the most diverse, green, and inspiring urban eco-system in the world that he has set aside £9 million ($12 million) for a ‘Greener City Fund.’ The creation of the foundation adds ballast to the organizers’ glorious target—the launch of the park in 2019.
After all, a glance at the new London National Park City Map, created for the initiative by social enterprise Urban Good (which can be ordered for free here) backs up the stats that the capital is already 49 per cent green and blue space—home to 14,000 species of wildlife and over 8 million trees. So what distinguishes a national park, like the 15 scattered around Britain, from a National Park City?
“The only difference between a national park and a National Park City,” explains Raven-Ellison, “is that the urban environment and landscape is just as important as rainforest or polar regions or a desert area. We shouldn’t alienate ourselves from nature just because we are the dominant species within this landscape.”
“I discovered that I was most relaxed and excited in deciduous woodland—and significantly more excited in urban than national park woodland.”
Daniel Raven-Ellison, explorer
“Acknowledging that opens up all kinds of opportunities,” he adds. “We have nine million people living in London, and we have all kinds of challenges, from air pollution to children with mental health problems because they’re not playing outdoors enough. The solution is in each one of us through the daily things we can all do—which I think is very empowering.”
Raven-Ellison, who is also a self-styled “guerrilla geographer” and National Geographic Emerging Explorer, has done his homework. This year, he embarked on an adventurous five-week urban wander, walking in a giant spiral around the city.
Starting in Enfield in north London and ending up by the river in Temple, he made his way on foot through London’s boroughs, parks, leafy streets, heaths, and across its rivers. Accompanied variously by activists, conservationists, members of the public (including the writer of this feature) and city councilors, he clocked up over 500 kilometers.
The year before, Raven-Ellison completed another pioneering expedition. He walked across the UK to explore how the landscape influences our mood, health and happiness, and donned sci-fi type sensors to record his brain activity. His findings may surprise some.
A National Park City could fuel the curiosity of urban explorers—after all, not all adventures need to be epic in scope or unfold in remote, challenging landscapes.
“Over my 1686 kilometers—spending roughly half my time in cities and half my time in national parks—I discovered that I was most relaxed and excited in deciduous woodland and significantly more excited in urban than national park woodland,” says Raven-Ellison.
“Perhaps because of the contrast of moving from built-up areas into the relative calm and beauty of wooded areas. This makes me reflect on how beneficial even small areas of woodland or a large tree can be for connecting adults and urban children with nature.”
While the campaign aims to address Londoners’ desire for a more liveable metropolis, a National Park City could also fuel the curiosity of urban explorers—after all, not all adventures need to be epic in scope or unfold in remote, challenging landscapes.
Take the National Park City Map: It lists all the capital’s parks, woodlands, playing fields, nature reserves, rivers, lakes and canals, but it also tells you where you can visit a city farm or find a community garden, go stand-up paddle boarding and kayaking, wild swimming or white-water rafting.
Flip the map over and it lists 20 ways to explore the capital, as well as the tallest hills in London, should you fancy a climb. It even pays homage to a popular nocturnal resident: The fox.
The whole idea has the potential to excite Londoners across the board. Trustee Judy-Ling Wong, CBE and the Honorary President of the Black Environment Network, spoke of how a National Park City could unleash a wave of creativity and inspire people to dream big. “Contributions from people at all levels can produce a huge force that will take us boldly into the future.”
That was evident at the launch event of the London National Park City Foundation, where winners of a competition set up by the charity shared their visions of how London could look as a National Park City.
Concepts submitted by architects, urban planners and designers, included a project to transform residential streets into a haven for wildlife; a trail that would wind through the city’s green neighborhoods to create a single uninterrupted garden path; a Living Network app to entice Londoners to engage with our green environment more interactively; and even a bus route—thrilling in its simplicity—connecting the capital’s major parks, making it easier for more people, including the car-less and those with disabilities, to explore and enjoy London’s green spaces.
With support from everyone from outdoors lovers to urban planners, artists to educators, social entrepreneurs and eco-warriors alike, all that’s needed now is the all-important majority backing of London’s local councillors. And once that happens, London will have made the leap to a more hopeful green future.